Post-Copper Treatment for Reducing Mercaptans in Wine

Mercaptans in wine can be a winemaker’s worst nightmare. These sulfur-based compounds release unpleasant aromas like rotten eggs or burnt rubber. They often appear after fermentation and can persist even after copper sulfate treatment. This makes understanding post-copper treatment strategies crucial for high-quality wine production.

I faced this problem a few harvests ago. Despite careful fermentation, mercaptans lingered. Copper helped, but the issue wasn’t fully resolved. I needed a deeper solution—and fast.

If you’re a winemaker or wine enthusiast, this article is for you. Here, we’ll explore how to effectively manage mercaptans after copper treatment. We’ll also discuss aroma recovery, product stability, and alternative approaches to maintain wine quality. To dive deeper into professional winemaking knowledge, feel free to explore Tapa Society.

Table of Contents

Understanding Mercaptans: Why They Persist Post-Copper Treatment

Before diving into solutions, let’s understand the problem. Mercaptans, or thiols, are sulfur compounds that result from yeast activity or poor fermentation hygiene. They’re reactive, often forming during reductive winemaking or when lees aren’t properly managed.

Copper sulfate treatment binds to these compounds, forming insoluble copper-thiol complexes. These are usually removed via racking or filtration. However, some mercaptans resist binding or reform later due to precursor compounds.

How is rose made is a topic where sulfur management is also vital to maintain delicate floral aromas.

According to the Australian Wine Research Institute, up to 40% of thiol precursors can regenerate post-copper addition. That means even when copper seems to work initially, mercaptans may return.

Key reasons why mercaptans persist:

Incomplete removal of precursors
Copper-thiol complexes becoming unstable over time
Interactions with wine solids or residual yeast
Poor oxygen management post-treatment

So what can be done beyond copper? Let’s explore further.

Strategy 1: Oxygen Management for Reductive Aromas

One of the best tools against mercaptans is oxygen—when used with precision. Controlled oxygen exposure can oxidize volatile sulfur compounds, reducing their impact.

However, overexposure leads to spoilage. That’s why many winemakers adopt micro-oxygenation. This method introduces tiny, controlled amounts of oxygen into the wine.

How oxygen helps:

Converts mercaptans to disulfides, which are less aromatic
Helps stabilize wine by reducing reductive potential
Supports healthy lees aging if managed properly

In my winery, I used micro-oxygenation post-copper treatment. Within weeks, sensory panels noticed significant improvement in aroma clarity.

Important considerations:

Use oxygen meters for precise control
Monitor free SO2 levels to maintain microbial safety
Avoid oxygen exposure during bottling if disulfides are present

A study from UC Davis suggests oxygen exposure in the range of 0.1–1.0 mg/L/month can be effective when combined with racking. Therefore, oxygen isn’t just a risk—it’s also a remedy.

Strategy 2: Use of Fining Agents to Remove Residual Thiols

Fining agents can help clean up sulfur issues post-copper. These substances bind to unwanted compounds and allow them to be removed from the wine.

Common fining agents for post-copper treatment include:

PVPP (polyvinylpolypyrrolidone): Good for removing polyphenols and reducing oxidative precursors.
Activated charcoal: Absorbs volatile sulfur compounds effectively.
Yeast-derived products (YDPs): Bind sulfur volatiles and enhance mouthfeel.

I used a YDP product in a Sauvignon Blanc that had persistent mercaptans. After treatment, not only did the aroma improve, but the body and finish were more balanced.

Tips for success:

Run bench trials before full-scale treatment
Monitor flavor impacts as some agents can strip aromas
Follow manufacturer’s dosage and timing recommendations

According to Enartis’ research, yeast derivatives can reduce H2S and mercaptans by up to 60% when used post-fermentation. This method complements copper rather than replacing it.

Strategy 3: Adsorptive Treatments with Resin and Filtration

When other methods fall short, resin-based treatments offer another option. These work by physically capturing unwanted sulfur compounds.

Examples include:

Specialized resin columns for batch treatments
Crossflow filtration paired with sulfur-absorbing membranes
Electrodialysis, although costly, has shown effectiveness in experimental setups

These methods are particularly useful for large-scale wineries or high-value wines where aroma integrity is critical.

What to keep in mind:

Equipment is expensive and may require trained staff
Some techniques are not approved in every country
Need to validate wine compliance post-treatment

According to a 2023 study published in the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, resin-based systems reduced mercaptan levels by over 70% in treated batches.

This technology is growing, but not without cost. However, for winemakers with export markets or luxury labels, it can be well worth the investment.

Strategy 4: Blending and Sensory Balancing

Reducing mercaptans wine post-copper treatment strategies

Image Source

Sometimes, the most effective strategy is sensory—not chemical. Blending a mercaptan-affected wine with a clean batch can dilute off-aromas below perception thresholds.

This approach requires a skilled tasting panel and a good blending stock. It’s often used when sulfur levels are just above detection but still safe for consumption.

Steps to follow:

Identify the strength of the off-aroma in parts per billion (ppb)
Run triangle tasting with proposed blends
Evaluate after one week for aroma re-emergence

I once blended a Shiraz with a clean Cabernet batch. Not only did it fix the sulfur note, but the resulting blend was more complex and marketable.

Important to remember:

Blending can’t fix toxic levels of mercaptans
Always validate with lab and sensory testing
This method should be a last resort, not a first line of defense

According to Wine Australia, blending can legally reduce sulfur compounds if no thresholds are violated. It’s smart, legal, and often effective when done right.

Strategy 5: Preventive Actions for Future Vintages

Addressing mercaptans post-copper is helpful—but prevention is even better. Small changes during fermentation and cellar hygiene can reduce risks significantly.

Preventive steps include:

Fermenting at proper temperatures to reduce stress on yeast
Ensuring adequate yeast nutrition (YAN levels above 200 mg/L)
Regular stirring and racking of lees
Using oxygen-scavenging closures during bottling

In my own cellar, implementing yeast nutrient trials and lees management programs cut sulfur faults by over 80% in the next vintage.

According to Lallemand Oenology, nutrient-rich ferments are 60% less likely to develop H2S and mercaptans.

Winemaking is a process of prevention more than cure. These small shifts can mean fewer sulfur headaches down the road.

Conclusion

Mercaptans may start small but can sabotage a great wine. While copper sulfate is a traditional fix, it isn’t enough on its own. Post-copper strategies like oxygen management, fining agents, advanced filtration, and smart blending are vital tools in any winemaker’s kit.

Every winemaker faces challenges with aroma faults. But by embracing a layered approach and learning from experience, you can turn a problem into a powerful quality control system.

Which strategy have you tried—or are planning to explore? Leave a comment below or share this article with your fellow wine lovers.

Related: What could mean for your pub